Discussion
I'm wondering about your comments regarding image quality of the Olympus 40-150 F/2.8 Pro paired with the MC-20 vs the Panasonic 100-300 F/4 at ~6:10 in your review. For me, it appears the left image is much softer than the right. Perhaps an edit error in the video or caption? Is the right image actually the 40-150 F/2.8? I'm considering purchasing an E-M1 MK II as my first M43 camera and while the 12-100 F/4 seems like a good option, being able to double the focal length of the 40-150 might push me to spend a little more and purchase the 12-40 and 40-150 F/2.8 lenses instead. That decision might be hanging on whether the left or right image is the 40-150. For someone starting out fresh in the M43 world with an E-M1 MK II, if you have a better recommendation for a long, sharp lens for wildlife at about the 40-150 price point, please don't hesitate to mention it. https://youtu.be/ZQjv-4QUPck?t=370
Well, the 12-40 would be great. if you don't want to go with a zoom, then one of the great primes would work. 17, 25 would be my choices. Also the 75 would work, but the focal length takes a bit to get used to. Also, the price tag is a bit hefty compared to the other two primes, but worth it, as the IQ is absolutely stunning.
Olympus is the best and well-known brand in the camera industry which is used by many of the photography lovers. The forum is about the questioning and answering of the Olympus camera at www.aussiewritings.com and the lens that is used in it.
I am glad that you shared this article. Shaukeens
As a result of improved ubiquity of computer games, an individual can find different web destinations which offer free electronic games to play. Visit https://www.techgyd.com/transform-studying-into-game-using-technology/37912/ homepage. These sites don't request any kind of downloading.